Our standard tolerance is ±0.3 mm up to 100 mm, then ±0.3 mm for the first 100 mm plus a further ±0.1% for every 100 mm after that. That is the number, published up front rather than buried in terms. Below: what it means on a real part, why additive tolerance works differently from machining, and how we hit tighter figures when a fit genuinely demands it.
3D printing tolerances · additive manufacturing accuracy · dimensional tolerance UK · 024 7736 0144

±0.3 mm for parts up to 100 mm.
Beyond that: ±0.3 mm for the first 100 mm, plus ±0.1% for every 100 mm thereafter.
The percentage matters more than people expect. It is applied to the dimension, not the part, so a long thin bracket and a large boxy housing are treated on the dimension being measured. Worked through, on a nominal dimension:
| Nominal dimension | Standard tolerance | How it is built up |
|---|---|---|
| 50 mm | ±0.3 mm | Under 100 mm — the flat figure applies |
| 100 mm | ±0.3 mm | At the threshold — still the flat figure |
| 200 mm | ±0.4 mm | 0.3 mm + 0.1% of the additional 100 mm |
| 300 mm | ±0.5 mm | 0.3 mm + 0.1% of the additional 200 mm |
| 500 mm | ±0.7 mm | 0.3 mm + 0.1% of the additional 400 mm |
| 900 mm | ±1.1 mm | 0.3 mm + 0.1% of the additional 800 mm |
These are general tolerances for a well-designed part in a standard grade. They are not a guarantee for every feature on every geometry — read the next section before you design to them. Reviewed by the RYSE 3D engineering team · August 2026.
A milled part starts as solid stock and has material removed by a tool whose position is known to microns. A printed part is built up from powder or filament that is melted, fused and then cooled — and cooling is where the dimensional story actually happens. The machine is not the limiting factor. Thermal behaviour is.
That is why additive tolerance scales with size while machining tolerance largely does not. A 20 mm feature has very little material shrinking around it. A 500 mm feature has a great deal, and every millimetre of that length contributes a small amount of thermal contraction. The ±0.1% term is that reality expressed as a number, rather than a promise nobody could keep.
It also means that the same nominal dimension can behave differently on two different parts, depending on wall thickness, how much material surrounds it, where it sits in the build and which way up it was printed. Anyone quoting a single tight figure for every part in every material is quoting a machine specification, not a part specification.
If a dimension is critical, these are the levers — and the ones we adjust when you tell us which faces matter.
The dominant factor, and the reason the rule scales. More length means more material contracting as it cools. Large-format parts carry proportionally more deviation than small ones — which is arithmetic, not a quality problem.
Thick sections hold heat longer than thin ones and shrink differently. A part with wildly varying section will move more than one with even walls — which is why uniform thickness is the first rule in every design guide we publish.
Holes and pins are most accurate with their axes in Z, and circular features lying in the XY plane tend to come out slightly elliptical. We set orientation, but if a bore has to be round, say so and we will stand it up.
Filled grades are more dimensionally stable under heat than unfilled ones. Elastomers move most. PA11 is more warp-prone across large cross sections than PA12. The grade you choose changes what is achievable before anything else does.
A hole through a thin wall is more accurate than the same hole through a thick one. Deep pockets, long unsupported spans and sharp section changes all reduce local accuracy relative to the general figure.
Some finishes are dimensionally neutral and some are not. Black dyeing adds nothing measurable. Vapour smoothing reflows the surface. Painting adds a physical layer to every coated face. Tell us the finish at quote, not after.
Plenty of parts have one or two features that genuinely need to be tighter than ±0.3 mm — a bearing seat, a sealing face, a dowel location, a bore that has to be round. The answer is not to promise a tolerance the process will not repeat. It is to print near-net and machine the features that matter.
That means designing in machining stock on the critical faces, printing the part, then finishing those features conventionally. You get additive geometry everywhere it helps and machined accuracy exactly where it is needed, on one part, from one supplier. It costs more per part than printing alone, and considerably less than tooling.
What we need from you is which dimensions are critical — at quote, not at inspection. Mark them on the drawing or say so in the notes. We will plan orientation, allow stock and inspect against them. Finding out afterwards that a bore was critical is the single most common cause of a part being remade.
A tolerance is only worth what the inspection behind it is worth.
Inspection runs under an independently certified quality management system covering every part from quote through to delivery, with traceability on each job.
Production part approval to automotive standards, for programmes that need documented, repeatable process control rather than a certificate of conformity alone.
Parts are verified against the CAD before they ship, which matters most on freeform geometry where a caliper has nothing useful to measure between.
Where you have identified critical features, those are the ones checked and reported — not a general dimensional sample that happens to miss the fit you cared about.
Need a specific inspection regime, a first article report or documentation for an approval pack? Tell us at quote and we will confirm what we can provide before you commit.
We would rather lose the job than deliver a part that will not gauge.
If the drawing calls for ±0.05 mm across the whole part, printing alone will not do it in any polymer process. Near-net plus machining will — or the part belongs on a mill.
At 900 mm the standard figure is ±1.1 mm. If a metre-long part needs to hold a few tenths across its length, additive is not the process, whatever the marketing says.
TPU parts move more than nylon, both in the build and in service under load. Dimensioning a flexible part to a rigid tolerance misunderstands what the material does.
A coated part is a different size from an uncoated one. If a fit is critical and the part is being painted, that has to be designed for, not discovered.
We inspect to the standard tolerance unless told otherwise. If a dimension matters and nobody flagged it, it gets treated like every other dimension on the part.
We are a polymer bureau. Where thermal expansion in service would open a fit beyond its allowance, a polymer part is the wrong answer regardless of how accurately it was printed.
Free design review with every quote — we will tell you what the process will hold on your geometry, and what needs machining, before anything is printed.
Our own ISO 9001 facility in Shipston-on-Stour, Warwickshire. Mon–Thurs 8am–4pm, Fri 8am–2pm. Call 024 7736 0144 or email hello@ryse3d.com.